Some of you may play that down as unimportant because Vista is a new OS and requires new hardware, but the fact is, tons of people will upgrade to Vista, and I can guarantee you a lot of them won't be seeing Aero when they do. NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X DEV0282 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. 128MB versions could have lower clocked memory to only 444MHz instead of 500MHz. nVIDIA ForceWare 44.03 for Windows XP/2K 32bit Modded INF Quickstart Guide. Otherwise, if they only focus on Aero, anyone who uses Home Basic or doesn't have a top-of-the-line video card is going to have an OS that looks like crap. Enhanced GeForce3 with higher clocks, added second Vertex Shader and using Lightspeed Memory Architecture II. They're gonna have a lot of work ahead of them in the next few months. medion nvidia geforce4 ti 4200 128mb sdram agp excellent condition - eur 40,88. I've really never seen any interface look as bad as that does. Windows Vista Basic is horrible in Beta 2 (obviously very little thought went into it so far), and Windows Classic is just a joke. Only compatible with DirectX 8.1 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it cant play todays games. It's not so much about whizbang graphics and effects as much as it is about having a respectable-looking interface. GeForce4 Ti 4200 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002.
the only thing halfway decent is full aero. As impressive as the faster members of NVIDIA's flagship line happen to be, it is the attractive low price. The rather obvious problem was one of product placement within their range. It wasn't too long ago that we crowned NVIDIA's GeForce4 Ti 4200 the best GPU under 200. start menu buttons are awful and differing fonts in explorer windows look bad too. NVIDIA had initially wanted to introduce a third card to the Ti 4xxx stable, the Ti 4200, in both 64MB and 128MB varieties. and Classic has been uglified horrifically. but the problem is that Aero Basic is not impressive at all - almost repulsive.